Understanding What Drives AI Adoption in Higher Education: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.5952Keywords:
AI tools,, Higher education, Self-efficiacy, Ethics, TAMAbstract
With the advancement of AI and its inevitable pervasiveness in many aspects of human life, there is an impetus to examine the determinants of its application in educational institutions. Based on Technology Acceptance Model, this study explores factors influencing the attitudes of teachers from higher education institutions in Serbia toward adopting AI. A total of 312 respondents participated in a survey, and their responses were analyzed using the PLS-SEM approach. It was found that self-efficacy and the lack of stress had a positive impact on the perceived ease of AI use. Prospects toward collaboration with colleagues and the positive image strongly impacted the perceived benefits of AI usage. In turn, both perceived ease of use and perceived benefits of AI usage positively impacted respondents’ attitude toward adopting AI. Special attention has been paid to the perception of ethical issues teachers are facing in the process of AI adoption, and the results indicate the relation between ethical considerations and perceived ease of use and attitudes toward AI. The findings are pertinent for higher education institutions evaluating the potential for implementing AI in teaching and research, as well as policymakers aiming to develop proper framework for the wider AI implementation.
References
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the theory of planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1559-1816.2002.TB00236.X
Akinwalere, S., & Ivanov, V. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Border Crossing, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.33182/bc.v12i1.2015.
Al Darayseh, A. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in teaching science: Science teachers’ perspective. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100132
Algerafi, M.A.M., Zhou, Y., Alfadda, H., & Wijaya, T.T. (2023).Understanding the Factors Influencing Higher Education Students’ Intention to Adopt Artificial Intelligence-Based Robots. IEEE Access, 11. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3314499
Aljarrah, E., Elrehail, H., & Aababneh, B. (2016). E-voting in Jordan: Assessing readiness and developing a system. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 860-867, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.076.
Almaiah, M. A., Alfaisal, R., Salloum, S. A., Hajjej, F., Shishakly, R., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Al Mulhem, A., Alkhdour, T., & Al-Maroof, R. S. (2022). Measuring Institutions’ Adoption of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Online Learning Environments: Integrating the Innovation Diffusion Theory with Technology Adoption Rate. Electronics, 11(20), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11203291
Al-Mughairi, H., & Bhaskar, P. (2024). Exploring the factors affecting the adoption AI techniques in higher education: insights from teachers' perspectives on ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-09-2023-0129
Anderson, S.L., & Anderson, M. (2021). AI and ethics. AI Ethics, 1, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00003-6
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming Education: A Comprehensive Review of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Educational Settings through Bibliometric and Content Analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712983
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1977-25733-001.pdf?auth_token=3b8119f5e21dff864ebd5b9 fdd961c99bb2a675a
Bates, T., Cobo, C., Mariño, O., &Wheeler, S. (2020). Can artificial intelligence transform higher education?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00218-x
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2018). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees' perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 24(2), 239–257. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55
Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, MI, & Andrade-Abarca, M. (2024). The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: Predictive model from UTAUT2. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1497705. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1497705
Cengiz, S., & Peker, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: the sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07433-7
Chandafa, M.J. & Huang, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence enhanced instruction: Reflection on teachers and students’ perceptions and practices. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 8(4), 1101-1128. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1234
Chatterjee, S., & Bhattacharjee, K.K. (2020). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: a quantitative analysis using structural equation modelling. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 3443–3463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10159-7
Chen, D., Liu, W., & Liu, X. (2024). What drives college students to use AI for L2 learning? Modeling the roles of self-efficacy, anxiety, and attitude based on an extended technology acceptance model. Acta Psychologica, 249, 104442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104442.
Chibisa, A., Sibaya, D. C., & Mutambara, D. (2022). Factors Affecting Pre-service Teachers’ Acceptance of Online Learning to Promote Social Distancing. Progressio, 43. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-5895/12229
Cordero, J., Torres-Zambrano, J., & Cordero-Castillo, A. (2025). Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Best Practices. Education Sciences, 15(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15010032
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technologies in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Davis, F.D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45, https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
Devi, S., Boruah, A.S., Nirban, S., Nimavat, D., & Bajaj, K.K. (2023). Ethical considerations in using artificial intelligence to improve teaching and learning. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 44(4), 1031-1038.
Falebita, O.S., & Kok, P.J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Tools Usage: A Structural Equation Modeling of Undergraduates’ Technological Readiness, Self-Efficacy and Attitudes. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1
Falebita, O.S., & Kok, P.J. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Tools Usage: A Structural Equation Modeling of Undergraduates’ Technological Readiness, Self-Efficacy and Attitudes. Journal for STEM Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00132-1
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Fütterer, T., Fischer, C., Alekseeva, A., Chen, X., Tate, T., Warschauer, M., & Gerjets, P. (2023). ChatGPT in education: global reactions to AI innovations. Scientific Reports, 13, 15310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42227-6
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hazaimeh, M., & Al-Ansi, A.M. (2024). Model of AI acceptance in higher education: arguing teaching staff and students perspectives. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(4), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-01-2024-0005
Hazzan-Bishara, A., Kol, O. & Levy, S. (2025). The factors affecting teachers’ adoption of AI technologies: A unified model of external and internal determinants. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z
Herzallah, A.M., & Makaldy, R. (2025). Technological self-efficacy and sense of coherence: Key drivers in teachers' AI acceptance and adoption. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100377
Hong, J-W., (2022). I Was Born to Love AI: The Influence of Social Status on AI Self-Efficacy and Intentions to Use AI. International Journal of Communication, 16, 172–191.
Hu, Y.H. (2022). Effects and acceptance of precision education in an AI-supported smart learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2013–2037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10664-3
Ilić, M. P., Păun, D., Popović Šević, N., Hadžić, A., & Jianu, A. (2021). Needs and performance analysis for changes in higher education and implementation of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Extended Reality. Education Sciences, 11(10), 568. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100568
Johnson, A. M., Jacovina, M. E., Russell, D. E., & Soto, C. M. (2016). Challenges and solutions when using technologies in the classroom. In S. A. Crossley & D. S. McNamara (Eds.) Adaptive educational technologies for literacy instruction (pp. 13-29). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Karan, B., & Chakma, C. (2025). Influence of higher education students’ perceived behaviour on their artificial intelligence acceptance: an empirical investigation using technology acceptance model. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2023-0535
Katsamakas, E., Pavlov, O. V., & Saklad, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions: A systems approach. Sustainability, 16(14), 6118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146118
Khlaif, Z. N., Alkouk, W. A., Salama, N., & Abu Eideh, B. (2025). Redesigning Assessments for AI-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative AI Era. Education Sciences, 15(2), 174. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020174
Kshetri, N. (2023). The Economics of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the Academic Industry. Computer, 56(8), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3278089
Kuleto, V., Ilić, M. P., Šević, N. P., Ranković, M., Stojaković, D., & Dobrilović, M. (2021). Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Teaching Process in Higher Education in the Republic of Serbia during COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(23), 12935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312935
Kumar, V., Ashraf, A.R., & Waqar, N. (2024). AI-Powered Marketing: What, Where, and How? International Journal of Information Management, 77, 102783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102783
Liu, M., Min, S., Ma, W., & Liu, T. (2021). The Adoption and Impact of E-Commerce in Rural China: Application of an Endogenous Switching Regression Model. Journal of Rural Studies, 83, 106-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.021
Liu, Y., & Du, Y. (2025). The Effect of Generative AI Ethics on Users’ Continuous Usage Intentions: A PLS-SEM and fsQCA Approach. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2465861
Low, M.P., Wut, T.M. & Pok, W.F. (2025). Artificial intelligence facilitators in higher education institutions: A student-centric exploration with comparative analysis in Asian countries. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13513-9
MacCallum, R.C., Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
Mah, DK., & Groß, N. (2024).Artificial intelligence in higher education: exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
Maphosa, V., & Maphosa, M. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Bibliometric Analysis and Topic Modeling Approach. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 37(1), 2261730. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2261730
McGarr, O. (2020). The Use of Virtual Simulations in Teacher Education to Develop Pre-Service Teachers' Behavior and Classroom Management Skills: Implications for Reflective Practice. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1733398
Migdadi, M.K., Oweidat, I.A., Alosta, M.R., et al. (2024). The association of artificial intelligence ethical awareness, attitudes, anxiety, and intention-to-use artificial intelligence technology among nursing students. Digital Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241301958
Mourtajji, L., & Arts-Chiss, N. (2024). Unleashing ChatGPT: Redefining Technology Acceptance and Digital Transformation in Higher Education. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 325. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120325
Mubin , O., Stevens, CJ, Shahid, S., Al Mahmud, A., & Dong, J.J. (2013). A Review of the Applicability of Robots in Education. Technology for Education and Learning, 209, https://doi.org/10.2316/Journal.209.2013.1.209-0015
Mustofa, R.H., Kuncoro, T.G., Atmono, D., Hermawan, H.D., & Sukirman (2025). Extending the technology acceptance model: The role of subjective norms, ethics, and trust in AI tool adoption among students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100379.
Nguyen, N. (2023). Exploring the Role of AI in Education. London Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 84-95. https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2023.6.108
Ofosu-Ampong, K. (2024). Beyond the hype: exploring faculty perceptions and acceptability of AI in teaching practices. Discover Education, 3, 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00128-4
Osman, Z., Alwi, N.H., Jodi, K.H.M., Khan, B.N.A., Ismail, M.N., & Yusoff, Y. (2024). Optimizing Artificial Intelligence Usage among Academicians in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance & Management Sciences, 14(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v14-i2/20935
Owoc, M.L., Sawicka, A., & Weichbroth, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies of Implementation. In: Owoc, M.L., Pondel, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence for Knowledge Management. AI4KM 2019. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 599. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85001-2_4
Pack, A., & Maloney, J. (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence in TESOL: Some Ethical and Pedagogical Considerations. Tesol Quarterly, 58(2), 1007-1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3320
Palade, M., & Carutasu, G. (2023). Organizational Readiness for Artificial Intelligence Adoption. Scientific Bulletin of the Polytechnic University of Timisoara Transactions on Engineering and Management. 7. 30-35.
Popović Šević, N., Šević, A., Slijepčević, M., & Krstić, J. (2025). AI adoption in higher education: Exploring attitudes and perceived benefits between users and non-users. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 15(4), e202528. https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/17246
Pushpakumar , R., Sanjaya, K., & Rathika, S., Ahmed, A., & Khamdamova , M., Venkatesh, S. & Rajalakshmi, B. (2023). Human-Computer Interaction: Enhancing User Experience in Interactive Systems. International Conference on Newer Engineering Concepts and Technology (ICONNECT-2023), Vol. 399, 04037. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339904037
Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The Consequences of Technostress for End Users in Organizations: Conceptual Development and Empirical Validation. Information Systems Research, 19(4), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165
Ramos Salazar, L., Peeples, S. (2025). ChatGPT Adoption in Higher Education: A Study of Faculty Generation Cohort, Self-Efficacy, and Innovativeness. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09865-3
Reinartz, W.J., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009), An Empirical Comparison of the Efficacy of Covariance-Based and Variance-Based SEM. International Journal of Market Research, 26(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.001
Ruiz, J.G., Torres, J.M., & Crespo, R.M. (2020). The application of Artificial Intelligence in project management research: A review. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(3), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.12.003
Saidi, S., Basir, A., Wahyuddin, et al. (2022). Mediating Role of Attitude and Impact of Social Support, Technical Support, and Perceived Ease of Use in Adoption of Technology During COVID-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 100, https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.100.001
Sallam, M., Elsayed, W., Al-Shorbagy, M., et al. (2024). ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: a study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1414758
Saukkonen, J., Huhtala, M., Rantonen, M., & Vaara, E. (2021). AI for learning – Views on impacts to teachership in the era of artificial intelligence. Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics ECIAIR 2021. A Virtual Conference hosted by Iscte – Instituto Universatário de Lisboa, 18-19 November.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? Rethinking the role of AI in education. AI & Society, (1st ed.) Polity Press.
Shao, C., Nah, S., Makady, H., & McNealy, J. (2024). Understanding User Attitudes Towards AI-Enabled Technologies: An Integrated Model of Self-Efficacy, TAM, and AI Ethics. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 41(5), 3053–3065. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2331858
Slijepčević, M., & Krstić, J. (2020). Organizational culture and perceived effectiveness: a case study of an insurance company. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 25(2), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2019.0019
Slimi, Z. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education: An Empirical Study. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 17-33. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no1a17
Sova, R., Tudor, C., Tartavulea, C. V., & Dieaconescu, R. I. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Tool Adoption in Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Understanding Impact Factors among Economics Students. Electronics, 13(18), 3632. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13183632
Spector, A. (2024). Data Science and AI in Context: Summary and Insights. Harvard Data Science Review, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.cdebd845
Steiger, J.H. (2007). Understanding the Limitations of Global Fit Assessment in Structural Equation Modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (Eds.) (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer, New York, NY
Taboada, I., Daneshpajouh, A., Toledo, N., & de Vass, T. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Enabled Project Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 5014. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13085014
Taddeo, M, & Floridi L. (2018). How AI Can Be a Force for Good. Science, 361(6404), 751-752. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat5991
Tan, P.S.H., Seow, A.N., Choong, Y.O., Tan, C.H., Lam, S.Y., & Choong, C.K. (2024). University students’ perceived service quality and attitude towards hybrid learning: ease of use and usefulness as mediators. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(5), 1500-1514. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2023-0113
Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E.B., & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2015). Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 25(2), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12042
Teo, T. (2011). Factors Influencing Teachers' Intentions to Use Technology: Model Development and Test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Toros, E., Asiksoy, G., & Sürücü, L. (2024). Refreshment students’ perceived usefulness and attitudes towards using technology: A moderated mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02839-3
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
Uwosomah, E. E., & Dooly, M. (2025). It Is Not the Huge Enemy: Preservice Teachers’ Evolving Perspectives on AI. Education Sciences, 15(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020152
Venkatesh, V & H. Bala (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4062395
Wang, Y., Liu, C., & Tu, Y-F. (2021). Factors Affecting the Adoption of AI-Based Applications in Higher Education. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 116-129.
Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D.F., & Summers, G.F. (1977). Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84-136. https://doi.org/10.2307/270754
Williamson, B. (2024). The Social Life of AI in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00342-5
Wirtz, J., & Bateson, J.E. (1995). An Experimental Investigation of Halo Effects in Satisfaction Measures of Service Attributes. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), 84-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564239510091358
Wright, S.A., & Schultz, A.E. (2018). The Rising Tide of Artificial Intelligence and Business Automation: Developing an Ethical Framework. Business Horizons, 61(6), 823-832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.07.001
Xue, L., Ghazali, N., & Mahat, J. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption among teachers: A systematic review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 8(3), 802-824. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1191
Yao, N., & Wang, Q. (2024). Factors Influencing Pre-Service Special Education Teachers' Intention Toward AI in Education: Digital Literacy, Teacher Self-Efficacy, Perceived Ease of Use, And Perceived Usefulness. Heliyon, 10, e34894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34894
Yeralan, S., & Lee, L.A. (2023). Generative AI: Challenges to Higher Education. Sustainable Engineering and Innovation, 5(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.37868/sei.v5i2.id196
Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L., Hofmann, F. & Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J.H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0
Zhang, Y., Qin, G., Cheng, L., Marimuthu, K., & Kumar, B.S. (2021). Interactive Smart Educational System Using AI for Students in the Higher Education Platform. Journal of Mult.-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 36(1-3), 83–98.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Technology in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
