Exploring Teachers’ Awareness and Perceptions of ChatGPT in K–12 STEM Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.5077Keywords:
Teacher awareness of ChatGPT, Artificial intelligence in teaching, Teacher perception of ChatGPT, STEM education, K-12 educationAbstract
Despite AI’s potential as an effective educational tool, there are still unresolved questions about teachers’ awareness of and perception regarding the impact of AI tools such as ChatGPT for teaching STEM content in a meaningful, ethical, and effective manner. This study explored teachers’ awareness and perceived impact of ChatGPT on teaching STEM content in K-12 and how these factors are related to their years of teaching experience. The study used secondary data sourced from a reputable online database. After the cleaning and selection process, only data from fifty-seven K-12 educators who met the inclusion criteria were identified and drawn from the larger dataset comprising 321 educators at all levels. The study revealed that most STEM teachers are aware of ChatGPT, but only a few use it extensively. They perceived ChatGPT’s impact and support for teaching STEM content as minimal. Additionally, the study showed that there was no significant relationship between teachers’ years of teaching experience and their awareness and perception of the impact of ChatGPT for teaching STEM content. The study recommends the need for professional development to strengthen teachers’ ethical and pedagogical use of ChatGPT, thereby supporting more positive perceptions of its impact in STEM education.
References
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858
Adeyele, V. O., & Ramnarain, U. (2024). Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in Inquiry-Based Learning: Teacher perspectives. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 200-217. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.638
Al-kfairy, M. (2024). Factors impacting the adoption and acceptance of ChatGPT in Educational settings: a narrative review of empirical studies. Applied System Innovation, 7(6), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi7060110
Alneyadi, S., & Wardat, Y. (2023). ChatGPT: Revolutionizing student achievement in the electronic magnetism unit for eleventh-grade students in Emirates schools. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(4), ep448.
Apata, O. E., Ajamobe, J. O., Ajose, S. T., Oyewole, P. O., & Olaitan, G. I. (2025), The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing classroom learning: ethical, practical, and pedagogical considerations. Paper presented at 2025 ASEE -GSW Annual Conference, Arlington, TX, Texas. 10.18260/1-2--55084
Arbulú Ballesteros, M. A., Acosta Enríquez, B. G., Ramos Farroñán, E. V., García Juárez, H. D., Cruz Salinas, L. E., Blas Sánchez, J. E., Arbulú Castillo, J. C., Licapa-Redolfo, G. S., & Farfán Chilicaus, G. C. (2024). The sustainable integration of AI in Higher Education: Analyzing ChatGPT acceptance factors through an extended UTAUT2 Framework in Peruvian Universities. Sustainability, 16(23) 1-28.
Bakti, I. K., Yarun, A., Syaifudin, M., & Syafaq, H. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v8i2.3194
Balahadia, F. F., Miranda, J. P. P., & Hernandez, H. E. (2023). Teachers’ and students’ awareness on the uses of chatgpt: a cross-sectional case study. 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM),
Beege, M., Hug, C., & Nerb, J. (2024a). AI in STEM education: The relationship between teacher perceptions and ChatGPT use. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 16, 100494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100494
Beege, M., Hug, C., & Nerb, J. (2024b). The Effect of Teachers Beliefs and Experiences on the Use of ChatGPT in STEM Disciplines. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4100167/v1
Bower, Matt; Torrington, Jodie; Lai, Jennifer; Petocz, Peter; Alfano, Mark (2023). Public data files containing the data used for the ChatGPT survey (XLSX) and the survey containing variable selection codes (DOCX).. Macquarie University. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.25949/24123306.v1
Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024). Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395
Cetin, Y., Tas, Ö., Alakus, H., & Kaplan, H. İ. (2024). Examining school principals' and teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT in Education. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2024.133.5
Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT into mathematics instruction: Perceptions, challenges, and implications for educators. Education Sciences, 14(7), 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070 742
ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers' perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of computer assisted learning, 40(3), 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926
Espinoza Vidaurre, S. M., Velásquez Rodríguez, N. C., Gambetta Quelopana, R. L., Martinez Valdivia, A. N., Leo Rossi, E. A., & Nolasco-Mamani, M. A. (2024). Perceptions of artificial intelligence and its impact on academic integrity among university students in Peru and Chile: An approach to sustainable education. Sustainability, 16(19), 9005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16209005
Goto, A., & Katanoda, K. (2023). Should we acknowledge ChatGPT as an Author? Journal of Epidemiology, 33, 333-334. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20230078
Hall, G. E. (1974). The concerns-based adoption model: A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED111791.pdf
Ji, Y., Zou, X., Li, T., & Zhan, Z. (2023). The effectiveness of ChatGPT on pre-service teachers' STEM teaching literacy, learning performance, and cognitive load in a teacher training course. Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Educational Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637907.3637948
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in education, 7, 755914. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Lee, G.-G., & Zhai, X. (2024). Using ChatGPT for Science Learning: A study on pre-service teachers' lesson planning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1683-1700. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3401457
Lee, I., & Perret, B. (2022). Preparing high school teachers to integrate AI methods into STEM classrooms. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 36(11), 12783-12791. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21557
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Lodge, A. (2024). Teachers' perceptions of artificial intelligence in the classroom (Publication No. 31484202) [Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Luan, L., Lin, X., Dai, Y., Allen, L., & Hu, S. (2024). Transforming STEM education: Leveraging ChatGPT for enhanced learning in psychology and neuroscience. ChatGPT and Global Higher Education: Using Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning, 100. Star Scholars Press.
Opesemowo, O. A. G. (2025). Teachers' attitude towards the use of ChatGPT for educational assessment. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences, 4(4), 1395 – 1403. https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1352
Ou, M., Zheng, H., Zeng, Y., & Hansen, P. (2024). Trust it or not: Understanding users’ motivations and strategies for assessing the credibility of AI-generated information. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241293154
Park, J., Teo, T. W., Teo, A., Chang, J., Huang, J. S., & Koo, S. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence into science lessons: teachers’ experiences and views. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00454-3
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for education and research: Opportunities, threats, and strategies. Applied sciences, 13(9), 5783. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095783
Robinson, D. H. E. (2024). STEM Teacher Perceptions in East Tennessee About Using Artificial Intelligence in Classroom Operations (Publication Number 31855205) [D.Ed., East Tennessee State University]. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/uky.edu?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/stem-teacher-perceptions-east-tennessee-about/docview/3171508902/se-2?accountid=11836
Sendawula, K., Kimuli, N. S., Kimuli, N. N., Kirugga, A., & Noordin, S. (2024, June). Beyond Potential: Exploring the Lived Experiences of Artificial Intelligence Usage in Ugandan Universities for Quality Education. In The Learning Ideas Conference (pp. 176-183). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Silva, P. (2015). Davis' technology acceptance model (TAM)(1989). Information seeking behavior and technology adoption: Theories and trends, 205-219. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8156-9.ch013
Simhadri, N., & Swamy, T. N. V. R. (2023). Awareness among teaching on AI and ML applications based on fuzzy in education sector at USA. Soft Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08329-z
Toyokawa, Y., Horikoshi, I., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of AI in inclusive education: a case study of data-enhanced active reading in Japan. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00286-2
Valentini, M., Szkandera, J., Smolle, M. A., Scheipl, S., Leithner, A., & Andreou, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence large language model ChatGPT: is it a trustworthy and reliable source of information for sarcoma patients? Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1303319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1303319
Vasconcelos, M. A. R., & Santos, R. P. D. (2023). Enhancing STEM learning with ChatGPT and Bing Chat as objects to think with: a case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19 (7) em2296. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13313.
Wang, K. D., Burkholder, E., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., & Haber, N. (2024). Examining the potential and pitfalls of ChatGPT in science and engineering problem-solving. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1330486. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1330486
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272
Whalen, J., Grube, W., Xu, C., & Trust, T. (2025). K-12 Educators’ reactions and responses to ChatGPT and GenAI during the 2022–2023 School Year. TechTrends, 69(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-01028-y
Zeeshan, K., Hämäläinen, T., & Neittaanmäki, P. (2024). ChatGPT for STEM Education: A Working Framework. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(4).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Technology in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
